The Plain Writing Act of 2010, Public Law 111-274, requires federal agencies to write "clear, concise, well-organized" prose in covered documents — anything the public needs to understand to comply with a requirement, get a benefit, or understand a program. It was signed on October 13, 2010, and agencies have been reporting their compliance to Congress and the Office of Management and Budget since 2012. The law defines plain writing by effect, not style: the document works if the intended audience can find what it needs, understand it the first time, and use it.
Which documents does the law cover?
The act covers documents an agency issues to the public, whether on paper or online. That includes letters about benefit eligibility, tax guidance, application forms and their instructions, enforcement notices, and most public web content that asks the reader to do something. It does not cover regulations as originally enacted — a separate 1998 executive order on plain language in rulewriting, later reaffirmed, addresses that — and it does not bind internal memoranda or anything not addressed to the public. State and local governments are outside the federal law entirely, though many have adopted their own plain-language policies.
What must agencies actually do?
The statute names four concrete duties, and each is verifiable. Agencies must designate a senior official to carry out the act — most publish the name on their plain-language or compliance page. They must train employees who write covered documents. They must maintain a plain-writing section on their website, typically a page that explains the agency's program and takes feedback when a document is not clear. And they must publish an annual guidance document and report compliance annually to OMB, with OMB aggregating progress to Congress. The feedback loop is the part readers can use: if a form confuses you, the agency's compliance page is the designated channel for saying so.
What does plain writing look like in practice?
The federal guidance, maintained at plainlanguage.gov by the Plain Language Action and Information Network, boils down to a few repeatable moves: write for your reader, lead with the main point, use "you" and other pronouns, prefer common words over jargon, keep sentences short, use headings and lists so a skimmer can navigate, and test the document on actual users before publishing. The test standard is the legal one — can the reader find it, understand it, and use it on first reading. Federal forms and notices have measurably changed under the law: the short-form tax notice letter program, redesigned benefit letters, and standardized online application flows all trace to plain-language mandates.
Related stories: What the federal website design standards require agencies to build · What data.gov is, and what agencies must publish on it.
How is the law enforced?
Gently, which is a fair criticism of it. The act contains no private right of action — a reader cannot sue over a confusing letter — and it relies on OMB oversight, agency compliance reports, and public pressure. The Center for Plain Language, a nonprofit, has published annual federal report cards grading agencies' compliance and document quality, and the contrast between graded agencies has been a recurring nudge. What enforcement exists comes through the annual reporting cycle: agencies that miss requirements show up in the record, and agency inspectors general occasionally examine compliance in broader reviews.
Why does it matter to you?
Plain writing is not decoration; it changes outcomes. The Treasury Department and tax-preparation studies have found that clearer notices raise response rates and reduce calls, and benefit agencies have found that clearer letters reduce improper payments caused by misread instructions. When a notice tells you exactly what to do, by when, and what happens if you do not, you are looking at the act working. When you get a dense letter that buries its deadline in paragraph nine, you are looking at the act's gap — and the agency's compliance page is where that gap is supposed to be reported.
Did the government write this way before 2010?
The 2010 act was the culmination of decades of fits and starts. President Nixon directed in the early 1970s that the Federal Register use plainer English, and agencies experimented with rewritten consumer forms through the 1980s. President Clinton issued a presidential memorandum in 1998 requiring plain language in regulations and other government documents, and Vice President Gore's National Partnership for Reinventing Government popularized rewritten notices. The 2010 statute turned that practice into standing law for public documents, which is why compliance survives changes in administration: the duty sits in the United States Code, not in a memo.
How can you spot a plain-writing failure?
Watch for the telltale patterns the guidance warns against. Sentences past thirty words, paragraphs with no heading in a two-page letter, defined terms you meet only after they are used, passive constructions that hide the actor — "it has been determined" — and deadlines stated without a date are the classic signals. The practical test is the statutory one: read the document once, put it down, and ask what you are supposed to do and by when. If you cannot answer from memory, the document has failed its legal standard, and the agency's plain-writing contact is the place to say so.
Do other governments require plain writing?
Yes, and the movement predates the federal statute. Sweden has required plain language in public communication since the 1930s, and the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand all run government-wide plain-language programs of long standing. Internationally, the International Organization for Standardization published plain language guidance in 2018, and a global standard now exists for what organizations — public and private — should aim for. The United States is therefore neither first nor alone; its distinguishing feature is that the federal requirement is a statute with named agency duties rather than a policy that each administration could rescind.